SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1476

G.S.N.TRIPATHI
Nand – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.B.L. Gaur

JUDGMENT :

G.S.N. TRIPATHI, J.

1. This revision is directed against the order dated 23.5.96 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat in Criminal Revision No. 52 of 1996, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has allowed the revision filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and quashed the order dated 26.4.96 passed by the learned C.J.M., Kanpur Dehat in Criminal Case No. 76 of 1996.

2. The brief facts are that the revisionist is the owner of Truck No. U.P.78-B/2457. On 29.3.96, that truck was found carrying 600 crates of foreign liquor, which was destined to be delivered in Arunachal Pradesh. The police officer attached to Police Station Bhognipur, District Kanpur Dehat intercepted the truck on the ground that the truck was carrying goods in violation of the Excise Act. An application was moved by the revisionist before the learned C.J.M., Kanpur Dehat for delivery of the truck as well as wine crates to him after taking suitable undertaking and security from him. An objection was raised on behalf of the State of Uttar Pradesh that since confiscation proceedings was pending before the Collector. Kanpur Dehat, u/s 72 of the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, therefore, neither the truck nor







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top