SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 2976

S.N.SRIVASTAVA
Rizwan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.K. Pundir, adv
For the Respondent: Anuj Kumar, Addl. S.C. and S.C., adv

JUDGMENT :

S.N. Srivastava, J.

Present petition has been preferred assailing the orders dated 14.7.2003 and 29.4.2003 passed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively.

2. The dispute in the instant petition takes within its sweep various plots, which were recorded as Gaon Sabha properties in the basic year. An objection was filed by the Petitioners u/s 9 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act claiming bhumidhari rights over the properties on the dint of adverse possession as also by relying on varg 4 entry. The Consolidation Officer who was seized of the objection allowed the same and pronounced the Petitioners as bhumidhars over plots in question vide judgment dated 22.4.1995 attended with further direction to record the names of the Petitioners as bhumidhars after expunging entry naming Gaon Sabha. Against the said judgment, appeals came to be preferred by the Gaon Sabha which culminated in being allowed and consequently, verdict rendered by the Consolidation Officer was set aside studded with direction to record entry accordingly in the relevant revenue record in relation to plots in question. This decision rendered by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation gave rise to three revis















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top