SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 3945

S.U.KHAN
Dheeraj – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent


ORDER :

S.U. Khan, J.

Petitioner and Mahendra jointly tried to usurp the property of Gaon Sabha. Learned S.O.C. and D.D.C. rightly thwarted the attempt. D.D.C. Bulandshahr Camp, Gautam Budh Nagar through order dated 26.2.2009 dismissed the Revision No. 42/80 of 2008-09, Dheeraj Singh v. State of U.P.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that Mahendra had not challenged the compromise in between petitioner and him and standing Counsel had no right to file appeal against order dated 5.12.2001 passed by CO. settling Gaon Sabha land with the petitioner on the ground that Mahendra had agreed for the same (earlier A.C.O. through order dated 9.1.1986 had settled Gaon Sabha land with Mahendra). It has also been argued that appeal was belated (filed in 2006) and no delay condonation application had been filed. u/s 11C of U.P.C.H. Act it is provided that if C.O., S.O.C or D.D.C. while hearing a case comes to the conclusion that any land vests in the State Government or Gaon Sabha then it shall be recorded in the; name of the State or Gaon Sabha even though no objection, appeal or revision has been filed by State or Gaon Sabha.

3. Accordingly, absolutely, no fault can be found with th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top