RAJIV JOSHI
Sunpat – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJIV JOSHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Anurag Bajpai holding brief of Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Moeez Uddin, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. Present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 12.12.2017 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 339 of 2018 (State Vs. Sunpat and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 610 of 2017, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, P.S. Dankaur, District Gautam Budh Nagar, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. As per the prosecution case in the F.I.R., an agreement to sell was executed on 21.3.2015 by the father of the applicants in favour of first informant/opposite party no.2 in respect of property bearing Khata no. 128, Gata no. 142 Kha, measuring 0.0890 hectare situated as Village Mutaina, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Budh Nagar for a sale consideration of Rs. 7,00,000/-, out of which, a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- was paid as earnest money and rest of the amount was agreed to be paid at the time of execution of sale deed. In the agreement, it is mentioned that the sale deed could
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.