SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 799

RAJIV JOSHI
Sunpat – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Praveen Kumar Singh, Adv., Moeez Uddin, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV JOSHI, J.

1. Heard Sri Anurag Bajpai holding brief of Sri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Moeez Uddin, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

2. Present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 12.12.2017 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 339 of 2018 (State Vs. Sunpat and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 610 of 2017, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, P.S. Dankaur, District Gautam Budh Nagar, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gautam Budh Nagar.

3. As per the prosecution case in the F.I.R., an agreement to sell was executed on 21.3.2015 by the father of the applicants in favour of first informant/opposite party no.2 in respect of property bearing Khata no. 128, Gata no. 142 Kha, measuring 0.0890 hectare situated as Village Mutaina, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Budh Nagar for a sale consideration of Rs. 7,00,000/-, out of which, a sum of Rs. 4,00,000/- was paid as earnest money and rest of the amount was agreed to be paid at the time of execution of sale deed. In the agreement, it is mentioned that the sale deed could

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top