IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
PANKAJ NAQVI, UMESH KUMAR, JJ.
Abdul Saboot @ Bhaiyya - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 5638 of 2003
Decided On : 12-07-2019
Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 and 34 – Arms Act – Section 25/27 – Appeal against Conviction – Alleged that above named persons had hired appellant / assasin to kill his father as he used to do pairavi in murder case of grandfather in High Court – Held, Appellant, who carried out execution of fatal assault on deceased – Thus acquittal of other co-accused for offence of conspiracy and under Section 302/34 IPC not enure to benefit of appellant – Omission to frame distinct and separate charge qua appellant under Section 302 IPC only an irregularity, not occasioning any miscarriage or prejudice as appellant knew right from day one that for what offence is he being charged – Appeal dismissed – (Paras: 20 and 21)
Facts of the case:
Appeal against Conviction – Alleged that above named persons had hired appellant / assasin to kill his father as he used to do pairavi in murder case of grandfather in High Court.
Findings of the court:
Appellant, who carried out execution of fatal assault on deceased – Thus acquittal of other co-accused for offence of conspiracy and under Section 302/34 IPC not enure to benefit of appellant – Omission to frame distinct and separate charge qua appellant under Section 302 IPC only an irregularity, not occasioning any miscarriage or prejudice as appellant knew right from day one that for what offence is he being charged.
Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
PANKAJ NAQVI, J.
1. This criminal appeal assails the judgment and order dated 8.10.2003 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.4), Kanpur Nagar, in S.T. No.682 of 2000, convicting and sentencing the appellant under Section 302 IPC to life with fine of Rs.20,000/- and a default sentence of 6 months, and in S.T. No. 683 of 2000, under Section 25/27 Arms Act to 3 years R.I. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.
1. The prosecution case in a nutshell is that PW-1 / the informant along with his father (victim) and brother Rehan (PW-2) left on 6.12.1999 at about 10:30 A.M, for Civil Courts, Kanpur Nagar. When they reached near Bhalla Medical store, a passerby called out for "Tausif" (victim), who stopped for a while, followed by firearm shot by that passerby at the victim, who was nabbed by a patrolling S.I, Anshu Mali (PW-3) and Constable Ram Swarup Yadav. The assailant disclosed his name as Abdul Saboot @ Bhaiya resident of Chamanganj. Two counrymade pistols, several cartridges and a bomb was recovered from the nabbed accused. PW-1 alleged that his grandfather, i.e, Sultan and his paternal brother Nafees were murdered 6-7 years ago by Shakil @ Munna, Viqar, Nyamul Raza, Shamim @ Chhote, Munna, Hamid, Atiq and Rasheed, in which two accused namely Shakil @ Munna and Viqar were sentenced to life imprisonment 3 months prior to the occurrence and the rest accused were absconding. PW-1 alleged that above named persons had hired the appellant / assasin to kill his father as he used to do pairavi in the murder case of the grandfather in the High Court.
2. On above allegations, a written report (Exbt. Ka-1) was scribed, which became a basis for registering an FIR as Case Crime no. 691 of 1999 under Sections 302/120-B IPC on 6.12.1999 at 11 A.M at the P.S, concerned.
3. Pw-3, the incharge at the P.S, was on patrolling duty on 6.12.1999, came across Constable Ram Swarup around 10:10 A.M. When they reached near Agrawal medical store, they heard the sound of firearm and shrieks, they got alerted to find that a person lay dead at the triangular crossing near Bhalla Medical Store while the other flaunting a weapon (countrymade pistol) was on the run, eventually nabbed around 10:30 A.M. The arrested person disclosed his name as Abdul Saboot @ Bhaiya, resident of P.S. Chamanganj, Kanpur Nagar. He confessed to have murdered the deceased on the instructions of one Nyamul Raza. PW-3 stated that PW's 1 and 2 also identified the accused-appellant. He recovered a countrymade pistol (315 bore) in running condition, with a 10 finger barrel and a butt measuring about 7 fingers. He upon opening the firearm found that a cartridge had been fired and an empty stuck in the barrel. He also noticed smell of gunpowder. He recovered another countrymade pistol (12 bore) almost of the same dimension along with three live cartridges of 315 bore, two live cartridges (12 bore), along with a boot polish box with the marking "Kiwi" shoe polish, which according to the accused was a bomb which was defused by pouring water. All the recoveries were duly sealed, a memo (Exbt. Ka-3) prepared under his signatures. The arrest and recoveries were authenticated by PW's.
4. Pw-9, the I.O, commenced investigation in the aforesaid case on 6.12.1999. He on the same date, executed parcha no.1 containing a copy of check FIR, copy of a report, statement of the informant and that of witnesses. He also inspected the scene and prepared a site plan (Exbt. Ka13). He carried out all investigational formalities including the inquest conducted by PW-3.
5. On the basis of the recovery of incriminating weapons, an FIR (Exbt. Ka-9) under Section 25/27 Arms Act as Case Crime no. 192 of 1999 and under Section 4/5 Explosive Act as Case Crime no. 693 of 1999 was registered at the P.S., concerned against the appellant.
6. After investigation 3 charge sheets (Exbt. Ka-15, 16 and 10A) were submitted by PW's-9 and 8 respectively.
7. The trial court framed the following charge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.