SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 804

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Narendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Alkesh Singh Chauhan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, J.

1. This appeal, under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., has been filed by Narendra, son of Lala Ram, Brajesh, son of Genda Lal and Pintoo alias Surendra Singh, son of Rajbahadur, against judgment of conviction dated 30.3.2010, passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act)/ Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 2, Mainpuri, in S.T. No. 30 of 2006, State Vs. Narendra and others, u/s 147, 323, 325, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. read with 3(1)(x) SC/ ST Act, related with Case Crime No. 321 of 2004, P.S. Bhogaon, District Mainpuri, and sentence made therein, whereby appellants, along with co-accused Kalyan and Genda Lal, were convicted for offences punishable u/s 147, 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. and accused-appellant Narendra was further convicted in addition to those conviction for offence punishable u/s 354 I.P.C. and after hearing over quantum of sentence convict Kalyan and Genda Lal were released on probation of good conduct, under their physical ailment and old year age, but present appellants Narendra, Brajesh and Pintoo alias Surendra Singh were sentenced with one year's R.I. with fine of Rs. 200/- and in default 15 days simple imprisonment for offence punishable u/s 147 I.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top