SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 859

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Pankaj Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Gaurav Kakkar, Adv., Mahesh Kumar, Adv., Azad Khan, Adv., Piyush Kumar Shukla, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Manju Rani Chauhan, J.

Counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant today in the Court, is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Piyush Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the complainant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. Perused the material on record.

4. The instant bail application has been filed by the applicant- Pankaj Pal respectively with a prayer to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No. 165 of 2017, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and D.P. Act, Police Station- Prem Nagar, District-Jhansi, during the pendency of the trial.

5. It transpires from the record that the first information report has been lodged by the father of the deceased, namely, Shiv Nandan Lal on 15.05.2017 against Pankaj Pal (applicant), Smt. Premvati (mother-in-law), Sheetal @ Nilam (sister-in-law) and Lallu Pal (father-in-law) with the allegations that he had solemnized marriage of his daughter, namely, Smt. Roshani (deceased) with the applicant on 12.07.2016 according to Hindu customs and rites and had spent money, according to his capacity. It has further been alleged that the family members of in-laws of the vic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top