MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Pankaj Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
Counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the applicant today in the Court, is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Gaurav Kakkar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Piyush Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the complainant, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Perused the material on record.
4. The instant bail application has been filed by the applicant- Pankaj Pal respectively with a prayer to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No. 165 of 2017, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and D.P. Act, Police Station- Prem Nagar, District-Jhansi, during the pendency of the trial.
5. It transpires from the record that the first information report has been lodged by the father of the deceased, namely, Shiv Nandan Lal on 15.05.2017 against Pankaj Pal (applicant), Smt. Premvati (mother-in-law), Sheetal @ Nilam (sister-in-law) and Lallu Pal (father-in-law) with the allegations that he had solemnized marriage of his daughter, namely, Smt. Roshani (deceased) with the applicant on 12.07.2016 according to Hindu customs and rites and had spent money, according to his capacity. It has further been alleged that the family members of in-laws of the vic
Bhadragiri Venkata Ravi Vs. High Court of A.P.
Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another
Heeralal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Lella Srinivasa Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Nallam Veera Stayanandam and others Vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.