SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 871

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Arvind Parmar @ Bunty – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ram Datt Dauholia, Adv., Nanhe Lal Tripathi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

This Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short hereinafter referred to as ''Cr.P.C.'), has been filed by the convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra, and Raheem Khan, against the judgment of conviction, dated 28.7.2018 and sentences awarded therein by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (U.P. Dacoity Affected Area), Lalitpur, in Sessions Trial No. 49 of 2013 (State vs. Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 1492 of 2012, under Sections 380, 411, 413 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur, whereby convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra and Raheem Khan have been sentenced with seven years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, each, under Section 380 IPC and three years' rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.5,000/-, each, under Section 411 IPC. In default of deposit of fine of Rs.10,000, they will have to serve six months' simple imprisonment and in default of deposit of fine of Rs.5,000/-, they will have to serve three months' simple imprisonment, with further direction for concurre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top