SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 872

DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Mohammad Yaqoob Mansoori – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Salman Ahmad, Adv., Diwakar Mishra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.

Heard Sri Salman Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Diwakar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri A.D. Mishra, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been moved with a prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 04.02.2012 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalaun at Orai in Complaint Case No.2646 of 2013 (Anil Babu Niranjan vs. Mohammad Yaquoob Mansoori) under section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, P.S. Kotwali Orai, District Jalaun at Orai and the entire proceedings of complaint case and also a prayer is made to stay the proceedings in this case till the disposal of this application.

3. In the affidavit filed in support of the stay application it is stated that as per the version contained in the complaint, the opposite party no. 2 runs an Electronic shop in Gandhi Market, Orai and the applicant is a proprietor of M/s. N.I. Purse Belt Store on main road, Orai. He does business by the said name. As per prosecution case, both the businessmen i.e. the applicant as well as the opposite party no. 2 were having good relation and since the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top