IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ram Krishna Gautam, J.
Arvind Parmar @ Bunty And Others - Appellant
Vs.
State Of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 5204 of 2018
Decided On : 05-08-2019
Cr.P.C. - Criminal Appeal - Sections 380, 411, 413 IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 411 IPC, which requires the prosecution to establish that the accused dishonestly received or retained stolen property, knowing it to be stolen. The court also analyzed the essential ingredients for the offence under Section 380 IPC, emphasizing the need to prove theft from a building used for human dwelling or property custody. The judgment highlighted the failure to establish the identity of recovered articles and the lack of evidence supporting the conviction.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an appeal against the conviction and sentences awarded to the appellants for offences under Sections 380 and 411 IPC. The appellants were convicted based on alleged recovery of stolen articles, but the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the offences under Sections 380 and 411 IPC. It noted the lack of evidence supporting the conviction and highlighted the failure to prove the identity of the recovered articles.
Issues: The key issues included the failure to establish the identity of recovered articles, the lack of evidence supporting the conviction, and the failure to prove the essential elements of the offences under Sections 380 and 411 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to establish the identity of recovered articles and the essential elements of the offences under Sections 380 and 411 IPC. It highlighted the lack of evidence supporting the conviction and the failure to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Final Decision: The Criminal Appeal succeeded, and the appellants were acquitted of all charges. The impugned judgment and order of conviction were set aside, and the appellants were directed to be released forthwith. They were also directed to furnish a personal bond and sureties in compliance with section 437-A Cr.P.C.
JUDGMENT :
Ram Krishna Gautam, J.
This Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short hereinafter referred to as ''Cr.P.C.'), has been filed by the convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra, and Raheem Khan, against the judgment of conviction, dated 25.7.2018 and sentences awarded therein by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (U.P. Dacoity Affected Area), Lalitpur, in Sessions Trial No. 50 of 2013 (State vs. Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 1420 of 2012, under Sections 380, 411, 413 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur, whereby convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra and Raheem Khan have been sentenced with five years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/-, each, under Section 380 IPC and three years' rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.3,000/-, each, under Section 411 IPC. In default of deposit of fine of Rs.5,000, they will have to serve six months' additional simple imprisonment and in default of deposit of fine of Rs.3,000/-, they will have to serve additional three months' simple imprisonment, with further direction for concurrent running of sentences and adjustment of previous incarceration, if any, in this case crime number, with this contention that the Trial court failed to appreciate facts and law placed before it and the judgment, 25.7.2018, of conviction and sentence, awarded therein, is illegal, perverse and against the weight of evidence on record. It was passed on the basis of surmises and conjunctures.
2. Sanjay Tiwari-Informant, PW-1, has lodged first information report on 14.7.2012, for occurrence of theft, said to have been committed in his house, in the night of 5/6.7.2012, which was got registered as Case Crime No.1420 of 2012, under Section 380 Indian Penal Code (In short hereinafter referred to as ''IPC'), against unknown accused persons, at Police Station- Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur. On 14.8.2012, arrest of Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, appellant no.1, Jeetu Parihar, Rajan, appellant no.2, and Naval Ahirwar, was alleged to have been made whereas Shivam Tiwari, Arvind Pal and Raheem Khan, appellant no.3, were said to have absconded. A joint recovery of golden ornament and other stolen goods, as written in the recovery memo, was said to have been made from joint possession of accused-appellants, who were apprehended. First information report was got lodged on 14.7.2012, whereas appellant nos. 1 and 2 said to have been arrested on 14.8.2012 by PW-4, SHO-Uday Bhan Singh, alongwith, PW-3 and Sub Inspector Sunit Kumar, Incharge SOG, and his team. Recovery was also said to have been made from appellant nos. 1 and 2, and appellant no.3 said to have fled from the spot, whereas no such recovery was there, except concocted and planted one. Co-accused, Arvind Pal, Jeetu Parihar, Naval Ahirvar and Shivam Tiwari were discharged on the basis of same evidence in Sessions Trial no.50 of 2013, arising out of Case Crime No.1420 of 2012, whereas appellants, in the present Appeal, have been convicted and sentenced, vide impugned judgment. Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, even then judgment of conviction was passed. It was a false recovery and false implication. Hence, this Criminal Appeal, with a prayer for setting aside judgment, thereby acquitting the appellants.
3. Heard Sri Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA, appearing for the State and gone through the impugned judgement as well as record of the Trial court.
4. From very perusal of the record, it is apparent that Case Crime No. 1420 of 2012, under Section 380 IPC, was got registered at Police Station- Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur on 14.7.2012, at 16.30 PM, for an occurrence of theft occurred in the night of 5.7.2012, at the house of informant-Sanjay Tiwari, being House No.67/1, situated at Devgarh Road, Gandhi Nagar, District L
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.