SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 948

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Arvind Parmar @ Bunty – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ram Datt Dauholia, Adv., Nanhe Lal Tripathi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

This Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short hereinafter referred to as ''Cr.P.C.'), has been filed by the convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra, and Raheem Khan, against the judgment of conviction, dated 25.7.2018 and sentences awarded therein by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge (U.P. Dacoity Affected Area), Lalitpur, in Sessions Trial No. 50 of 2013 (State vs. Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 1420 of 2012, under Sections 380, 411, 413 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur, whereby convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra and Raheem Khan have been sentenced with five years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/-, each, under Section 380 IPC and three years' rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs.3,000/-, each, under Section 411 IPC. In default of deposit of fine of Rs.5,000, they will have to serve six months' additional simple imprisonment and in default of deposit of fine of Rs.3,000/-, they will have to serve additional three months' simple imprisonment, with further di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top