SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 961

PANKAJ MITHAL, SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Anupma Mehrotra – Appellant
Versus
Honble Chancellor Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Neeraj Tripathi, Adv., Arvind Srivastava, Adv., Kshitij Shailendra, Adv., Siddharth Khare, Adv., Vivek Verma, Adv., Manish Ta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. Under challenge in this writ petition is the order of the Chancellor, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, Bareilly dated 06.08.2018 by which the representation of the petitioner filed under Section 68 of the U.P. State Universities Act (hereinafter referred to as "Act") has been rejected.

2. The dispute which was referred to the Chancellor under Section 68 of the Act was with regard to the validity/correctness of the order of the Vice Chancellor of the University dated 23.09.2016 in context to interse seniority of the petitioner qua contesting private respondents No. 8 to 11 who are all teachers in the Dayanand Arya Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Moradabad affiliated to the above university.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner was duly selected and recommended by the U.P. Higher Education Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Commission") on 28.01.1991 as Lecturer (Home Science) and was allotted the above institution. Consequently, the Committee of Management of the institution issued appointment letter to her and the petitioner joined services on 20.06.1991. Thus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top