SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 981

SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAJENDRA KUMAR
Devarsh Nath Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Zain Abbas, Adv., Gagan Mehta, Adv., Ashok Mehta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Heard Sri Zain Abbas, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent and Sri Ashok Mehta, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Gagan Mehta, learned counsel for University-respondent 3.

2. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed by sole petitioner Devarsh Nath Gupta, undergoing medical course i.e. Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (hereinafter referred to as 'M.B.B.S.') in S. N. Medical College, Agra (hereinafter referred to as 'S.N.M.C.') affiliated to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra (hereinafter referred to as 'Agra University'), it is a clear illustration of irresponsible and unaccountable act of Examiners in performance of their duty of evaluation of answer sheets, causing great loss to Examinees.

3. Many or most of the matters, where such negligence is shown by Examiners, remain uncomplained of, since, Students/Examinees lack resources or information, or, many times do not have requisite awareness as to how such situation be dealt with, hence permanently suffer on account of



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top