SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Virendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
Shaqeel Ahmad - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another - Respondent
Application U/s. 482 No. 18400 of 2005
Decided On : 22-05-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sarvesh.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate.

The central legal point established in the judgment is that cognizance of the offence under Section 498 I.P.C can only be taken on a complaint filed by the authorized person, as stipulated in Section 198 of the Code.

Headnote:

Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure - Quashing of proceeding of criminal case u/s 498 Indian Penal Code (I.P.C) - Section 198 of the Code - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 498 I.P.C, Section 198 (1) and 198(2) of the Code - The court discussed the provisions of Section 198 of the Code, which provides for launching a prosecution in matrimonial offences only on the complaint made by the person aggrieved. The court highlighted the specific legal provisions and their interpretations, emphasizing that cognizance of the offence under Section 498 I.P.C can only be taken on a complaint filed by the authorized person.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed for quashing of criminal case proceedings under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging false implication in a case of enticing and detaining a married woman. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 198 of the Code and found that the proceedings were in violation of the specific provision, leading to the decision to quash the criminal case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the proceedings were in violation of the specific provision of Section 198 of the Code, which led to the decision to quash the criminal case.

Issues: The issues revolved around the application of Section 198 of the Code and the legality of the proceedings under section 498 I.P.C without a complaint from the authorized person.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 198 of the Code, which stipulates that cognizance of the offence under Section 498 I.P.C can only be taken on a complaint filed by the authorized person.

Final Decision: The application under section 482 Cr.P.C was allowed, and the proceeding of the criminal case was quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Virendra Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Case called out in the revised list. Learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anirudh Sharma, learned A.G.A for the State are present. No one is present on behalf of opposite party No.2.

2. The instant application under section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure (Code) has been filed for quashing of proceeding of criminal case No. 1405 of 1999, u/s 498 Indian Panel Code (I.P.C) (Sate v. Shaqeel Ahmad) pending in the court of A.C.M.M-I, Kanpur Nagar.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The brief facts of this case are that the opposite party No.2 Aneesa daughter of Waris Ali resident of 89/119, Basmandi, police station Anwarganj, District Kanpur Nagar had filed an application under section 156(3) of the Code against the applicant Shaqeel Ahmad and five others persons with the allegation that they are resident of her mohalla and on 20.4.1996 the applicant Shaqeel Ahmad had enticed away her with jewellery of Rs.40,000/- belonging to her mother and grand mother and Rs.5,000/- cash. He kept her at Allahabad, Delhi and committed rape against her will and consent and on 21.7.1996 finally left her at railway station, Fatehpur. She filed an application for lodging the first information report but the police did not lodge the same. It was also alleged that during her kidnapping, her father had made a complaint against Shafeeq Ahmad whereupon the father of applicant and other persons named in the said application become annoyed, hurled abuses and slapped her father and also beaten with lathi. It was also alleged in the said application that the applicant was not ready for performing marriage with her. In compliance of order passed by the learned Magistrate, a case crime No. 5/99, under sections 363-A/366, 376 401, 232, 504 and 506 I.P.C was lodged at police station Anwarganj, District Kanpur Nagar and after conclusion of investigation, a charge sheet only under section 498 I.P.C was filed only against the applicant Shaqeel Ahmad. The learned Magistrate upon the said police report proceeded against the applicant/-accused and upon his appearance a charge was also framed.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case on the account of his denial to marry with opposite party No.2. The opposite party No.2, Aneesa had already been married with one Akhtar about 8 years ago. He has further submitted that no case under section 498 I.P.C is made out against the applicant. The offence under section 498 I.P.C is non-cognizable and no cognizance could be taken in such offence on the police report. According to Section 198 (I)(b) of the Code, cognizance of such offence can be taken only on the complaint filed by the person authorized under the said section. The cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate is against the provision of law and the impugned order as well as criminal proceedings is liable be to quashed.

5. Per contra learned A.G.A has vehemently opposed the submission raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that the applicant can agitate his grievance at the appropriate stage before the lower court. He has not filed any objection upon being summoned by the concerned Magistrate. The charge has been framed and the case has been fixed for the statement of witnesses. No relief can be given at the belated stage. The proceeding of lower court can not be quashed at this stage.

6. Section 498 I.P.C is an offence for enticing or taking away or detaining or concealing a married women with intention that she may have illicit intercourse with any person is covered by Chapter XX of IPC. Section 198 of the Code provides that in matrimonial offences as provided under Chapter XX of the IPC, a prosecution can be launched only on the complaint made by the person aggrieved as enumerated in Section 198 (1) and 198(2) of the Code. Relevant provision of Section 198 (1) I.P.C and 198(2) of the Code are quoted as under:-

S. 198

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top