PANKAJ MITHAL, PRAKASH PADIA
Shyam Babu Vaish – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner who was a member of the U.P. Higher Judicial Service and retired on 30.06.2006 as District Judge has preferred this writ petition questioning the punishment order dated 07.11.2012 passed by the Hon'ble Governor of U.P. (Annexure-14) withholding 50 per cent of his pension on the recommendation of the High Court.
2. The petitioner as District Judge, Barabanki got conducted examination for the selection of class-III (including clerks and stenographers) and class-IV employees of the Judgeship for which purpose he constituted two independent committees of 5 and 3 members respectively under the Chairmanship of two different Senior Judicial Officers of the district.
3. An advertisement inviting applications for the purposes of the above recruitment was published on 30.07.2004 in the newspapers. The examination for class-III and class-IV posts were held on 29.09.2004 in accordance with the provisions of U.P. Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947/Rules for Recruitment of Ministerial to the Subordinate Offices, 1950 and the provisions of U.P. Subordinate Civil Court Inferior Establishment Rules, 1955 respectively. The result of the class-III
Coal India and Others Vs. Saroj Kumar Mishra
Durga Prasad Pachouri Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Man Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Pawan Kumar Agrawal Vs. General Manager-II and Appointing Authority, State Bank of India and Others
Ram Kishan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. Jitendra Prasad Singh and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.