Bhartiya Mazdoor Sang U. P. vs Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(All) 2433

SUNITA AGARWAL
Bhartiya Mazdoor Sang U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shyam Narain,Gopal Narain Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Ayank Mishra

JUDGMENT :

Sunita Agarwal, J.

1. Heard Sri Gopal Narain Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ayank Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present petition is directed against the award dated 17.07.2017 published on the notice board on 09.07.2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, (4), U.P. Agra in Adjudication Case No.48 of 1991. The dispute referred to the tribunal for adjudication reads as under:-

1- D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk layXu ifjf'k"V esa mfYyf[kr vius 25 Jfedksa dks fnukad 25-04-1990 ls dk;Z ls i`Fkd@oafpr fd;k tkuk vuqfpr ,oa voS/kkfud gS\ ;fn gka] rks lacaf/kr Jfed D;k fgrykHk@{kfriwfrZ ikus ds vf/kdkjh gSa\

2- ;fn mDr okn fcUnq lacaf/kr Jfedksa ds i{k esa fu.khZr gS] rks D;k lacaf/kr Jfedksa dks muds in ij fu;fer@LFkk;h fd;k tkuk pkfg,\ ;fn gka] rks fdl frfFk ls\

3. The petitioner-Union raised an industrial dispute regarding termination of services of 25 workmen w.e.f 25.04.1990, who allegedly were working with the respondent-corporation. The award dated 29.08.1995 was passed in favour of the workmen and it was held that these workmen fell within the definition of 'workman' in terms of Section 2(z) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act' 1947 (herein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(All) 2433

SUNITA AGARWALBhartiya Mazdoor Sang U. P. – AppellantVersusPresiding Officer Industrial Tribunal – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SUNITA AGARWAL
Bhartiya Mazdoor Sang U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal – Respondent