SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1293

PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Manjari Developers – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arun Kumar Gupta
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to accept and include E-Tender of the petitioners and consider the same at the time of finalizing the Bid, which is likely to be done on 28th February, 2019 or 1st March, 2019. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no. 4 had invited E-Tender in the news paper (Hindustan) on 27.12.2018 for the construction of under ground two level parking in front of Varansi Kachehri between Circuit House and Commissioners Sabhagar. The date of opening of technical Bid was 28.01.2019 at 02.00 PM and finalization of Bid was 30.01.2019 at 12.00 noon. Clause 1 and 5 of the E-Tender is relevant, which reads as under:

    **1- fufonk izi= dks mijksDrkuqlkj fu/kkZfjr ewY; o okafNr /kjksgj /kujkf'k dk Hkqxrku R.T.G.S. ds ek/;e ls ifj;kstuk izcU/kd LdkbZ&okjk.klh ds i{k esa vyx&vyx dk;kZsa gsrq fuEu fooj.k ds vuqlkj fufonk [kqyus dh frfFk ls ,d fnu iwoZ rd fd;k tk lds mijksDr dh Ld

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top