DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA, NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Randhir Singh – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate Faizabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Ravi Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 and Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for the respondent No.3.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 8.6.2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Faizabad, whereby representation dated 1.6.2017 preferred by the petitioner for protection of his life and property under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2007”) has been rejected on the wrong premises.
3. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts of the case are as under :
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.