PANKAJ BHATIA
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised list. Learned Standing Counsel or the State is present.
2. The petitioner challenges the orders dated 13.6.2013 and 30.10.2012, passed by respondent nos. 2 and 4 respectively, arising out of suit under Section 229-B of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
3. The facts of the case are as follows:
4. The petitioner's father, Ratan Singh, resident of Village Jhalu, Pargana-Daranagar, Tehsil and District Bijnor was the Seerdar of certain land situated in the village but, due to the mistake of the revenue authorities, the name was incorporated as Asami in revenue records. The father of the petitioner, aggrieved against the said wrong recording in the revenue records, filed a suit under Section 229-B of the Act before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bijnor, which was numbered as Case No. 25/1984 (Ratan Singh and others vs. Land Management Committee). In the said suit, notices were issued to the affected parties including the Land Management Committee who contested the said proceedings and, after hearing the parties, three issues were framed and wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.