SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1412

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Deepak Chugh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Kumar Pandey, Adv., Satish Trivedi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail has been moved by Deepak Chugh in Case Crime No. 250 of 2019, under Sections 323, 506, 498-A, 354(a) I.P.C. read with Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar.

2. Learned counsel for applicant argued that there is a family dispute in between accused and his wife, who were married in year 2001. She went with her kids to her parental house and she was with her paramours, which was never complained by accused to anyone because of family prestige. On 28.06.2019, she along with her siblings went to her parental house and even after request on birthday of applicant on 29.06.2019, she did not turn up. On 04.07.2019 she sent some photographs over whats app. On 09.07.2019 applicant was at Mumbai regarding his business work and he came back on 14.07.2019. He found obscene messages with obscene selfie photos over mobile phone of his wife. This was protested, resulting abuse by her and she demanded Rs.3 crores in lieu of Talaq, otherwise to face dire consequences. She again went to her parental house. Those mobile numbers and name of holders were reported to police by way of applicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top