Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Satish Chaturvedi
For the Respondent: Ram Milan Mishra

Based on the legal document provided, here are the key points regarding the case Moradabad Development Authority - Appellant vs. Shri Sai Sidhi Developers - Respondent:

• Subject Matter: The case deals with Civil Law, specifically regarding Injunctions, Temporary Injunctions, and the interpretation of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) alongside inherent powers under Section 151 CPC. (!) (!) (!)
• Core Legal Principle: To grant a temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, the court must consider three specific ingredients: (a) a prima facie case, (b) balance of convenience, and (c) irreparable loss or injury. (!) (!) (!)
• Mandatory Recording of Reasons: It is settled law that while granting or rejecting an injunction, the court is mandatory required to record reasons for its decision. (!) (!)
• Appealability of Interim Orders: Not every interim order passed during the pendency of a temporary injunction application falls under Order 39 Rule 1. An order granting "interim protection" solely because a report is pending, without applying the three-pronged test for injunctions, does not qualify as a temporary injunction order under Order 39 Rule 1 and thus is not appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(r). (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
• Facts of the Case: The trial court had granted an