AJAY BHANOT
Constable 339/381 C. P. Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Ajay Bhanot, J.
1. Heard Sri P.C. Pandey and Kashinaresh Mishra, learned counsels for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner was a Constable in the U.P. Police Force. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on the foot of a charge sheet dated 09.09.2011.
3. The disciplinary proceedings culminated in the order of termination of the services of the petitioner passed by the disciplinary authority on 13.04.2012. The petitioner carried the order of termination before the appellate authority. The appeal of the petitioner was rejected by the appellate authority on 29.11.2012. Not satisfied, the petitioner took the order of the appellate authority in revision, with no better results. The revision was dismissed by order dated 31.07.2013. The termination was thus affirmed by the appellate and the revisional authority.
4. Aggrieved by the orders dated 13.04.2012, 29.11.2012 and 31.07.2013 passed by the disciplinary authority, appellate authority and the revisional authority respectively, the petitioner instituted the present writ petition and has assailed the aforesaid orders in the writ petition.
5. Learned counsel for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.