K.J.THAKER, SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
Vijai – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suresh Kumar Gupta, J.
1. The appellant-accused have preferred Criminal Appeal No. 43/2006 under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 22.11.2005 passed by Sri Ram Preet Dwivedi Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Court no. 2, Meerut in Sessions Trial No. 1105 of 2005 in State of U.P. Vs. Vinod alias Julphi and others. Trial Court convicted accused-appellants Vijay, Sunil, Vinod @ Julfi under Section 396 I.P.C. for life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000/-each in default simple imprisonment for one month, under Section 412, seven years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000/-each in default one month simple imprisonment with the stipulation that all sentences shall run concurrently.
2. The incident is of May 2002 and decision of trial court is rendered on the appeal was preferred in 2006 and the accused are in jail since June, 2002.
3. Brief facts as culled out from record of this case are
Amar Nath Jha Versus Nand Kishore Singh and Others reported in (2018) 9 SCC 137
Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr. v. State of Andrha Pradesh [Jt 1993 (2) SC 559 : 1993(2) SCC 684]
Manpreet Singh alias Goldee Vs. State of Punjab 2015 (7) SCC 167
Mukesh and Anr. Vs. State for NCT of Delhi and Others
Musheer Khan V. State of U.P. reported in 2010 (2) SCC 74
Padala Veera Reddy v. State of M.P. reported in 1989 (4) JT 223
Pulukuru Kottaya & Ors. Vs. Emperor
Raja alias Rajinder Vs. State of Haryana 2015 (4) JT 57
State of Gujrat Vs. Kishanbhai and Others (2014) 5 SCC 108
State Of Maharashtra vs. Bharat Fakira Dhiwar
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.