SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 2538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J.
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Shadab Ahmad and 3 Ors. - Respondents
First Appeal From Order No. 3823 of 2018
Decided On : 04-10-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vinay Kumar Khare.

The assessment of compensation for personal injury under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is based on the extent of permanent disability and loss of earning capacity, taking into consideration the claimant's occupation and the impact of the disability on their ability to work effectively.

Headnote:

Motor Accident Claim Tribunal - Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - 279, 338, 337, 427 IPC - 1. Whether on dated 29.05.16 at about 08.30 P.M. at Nurpur-Moradabad Road near before the turn of Village-Askripur under the jurisdiction of Police Station-Nurpur, District Bijnor, the driver of Truck No. HR 85 9006 driven by him in rash and negligent manner hit the Swift Car No. DL 08 CAD 4367 which caused accident resulting into injuries to the claimant? 2. Whether on the date of the alleged accident the driver of Truck No. HR 58 9006 was having valid and effective driving license? 3. Whether on the date of the alleged accident Truck No. HR 58 9006 was insured with the respondent no.3 insurance company? 4. Whether on the date of the alleged accident Swift Car No. DL 08 ACD 4367 was insured with the respondent no.4 insurance company? 5. Whether the claimant is entitled to any compensation? If yes, then how much and from whom? - The claimant was involved in a head-on collision with a speeding truck, resulting in serious injuries and the death of a passenger. The court found the truck driver to be at fault and awarded compensation to the claimant based on the extent of permanent partial disability and loss of earning capacity. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the compensation awarded by the tribunal.

Fact of the Case:

The claimant was involved in a head-on collision with a speeding truck, resulting in serious injuries and the death of a passenger. The claimant filed a claim petition alleging permanent partial disability and loss of earning capacity.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the truck driver to be at fault and awarded compensation to the claimant based on the extent of permanent partial disability and loss of earning capacity.

Issues: The issues included determining fault for the accident, validity of driving license, insurance coverage for the vehicles involved, and entitlement to compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of res ipsa loquitur to determine fault for the accident and relied on medical evidence to assess the extent of permanent partial disability and loss of earning capacity. The court also considered the claimant's occupation and the impact of the disability on his ability to work effectively.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the compensation awarded by the tribunal.

JUDGMENT :

1. This First Appeal From Order is by the National Insurance Company Ltd. challenging a judgment/award of the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.6, Bijnor, dated 31.5.2018, passed in M.A.C.P. No.90 of 2017, whereby the claim petition has been allowed in part. The claim for compensation has been decreed to the extent of Rs.18,04,214/-, together with interest at the rate of 7% per annum, from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization. A sum of Rs.10,00,000/- has been directed to be deposited in some Nationalized Bank as fixed deposit for a period of 03 years. Aggrieved by this determination, the present appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are that claimant was coming from Amroha to his village Mahdood Nasho in his Swift Car No. DL08 CAD 4367 on 29.5.2016 together with his brothers when he was hit by speeding truck coming from other side at about 8.30 p.m. The head-on collision resulted in serious injuries being caused to the claimant and other fellow passengers on their face and other parts of the body. One person, namely Ashfaq Ahmad, who was travelling in the same car died, while others sustained serious injuries. A timely First Information Report was lodged in Case Crime No.286 of 2016, under Sections 279, 338, 337 and 427 IPC. A claim petition thereafter has been filed alleging that the claimant is 34 year old Contractor registered with CPWD, Delhi, and has suffered permanent partial disability in his lower limb. The claimant alleges his income to be Rs. 07 lacs per annum on the basis of Income Tax Return submitted by him.

3. After the accident, claimant was taken to Government Hospital Nurpur and was then referred to Government Hospital, Bijnor. The claimant appears to have been taken to a private hospital in Meerut, where he remained under treatment of one Dr. Rohit Garg. In the claim petition filed an amount of Rs.34,00,000/- together with interest @ 12% per annum is claimed. The offending vehicle with which accident was caused in head-on collision was insured with the appellant, and therefore, in the claim petition the owner as also the Insurance Company were impleaded as defendants. The claim was contested by the appellant questioning all the averments pleaded by claimant in the plaint. According to the Insurance Company neither any accident was caused nor the insured vehicle (Truck No. HR 58 9006) was involved in the accident.

4. On the basis of respective pleadings of the parties, following five issues have been framed:-

"1. Whether on dated 29.05.16 at about 08.30 P.M. at Nurpur-Moradabad Road near before the turn of Village-Askripur under the jurisdiction of Police Station-Nurpur, District Bijnor, the driver of Truck No. HR 85 9006 driven by him in rash and negligent manner hit the Swift Car No. DL 08 CAD 4367 which caused accident resulting into injuries to the claimant?

2. Whether on the date of the alleged accident the driver of Truck No. HR 58 9006 was having valid and effective driving license?

3. Whether on the date of the alleged accident Truck No. HR 58 9006 was insured with the respondent no.3 insurance company?

4. Whether on the date of the alleged accident Swift Car No. DL 08 ACD 4367 was insured with the respondent no.4 insurance company?

5. Whether the claimant is entitled to any compensation? If yes, then how much and from whom?"

5. In order to prove its claim, the claimant has examined PW-1 Shadab Ahmad and PW-2 Parvez Alam, who are stated to be eye-witnesses. The doctor has also been produced as PW-3. Apart from the aforesaid, documentary evidence in the form of F.I.R., C.D., Driving Licence and Insurance Policy etc. have been produced. The claimant has also filed treatment cards, medical bills, conveyance charges etc. to substantiate the injury caused t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top