SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1700

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Panna Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sudhir Dixit, Adv., S.P.S. Chauhan, Adv., Meenakshi Chauhan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

This application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. has been moved by Panna Lal Sharma with a prayer for grant of leave to file appeal against judgment of acquittal dated 02.11.2002, passed by IXth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh in Complaint Case No. 1996 of 2002 (Panna Lal Sharma Vs. Rewati Prasad), under Section 420 I.P.C., Police Station Tappal, District Aligarh, whereby Rewati Prasad has been acquitted from the charge of offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for applicant argued that it was a complaint case filed against Rewati Prasad by Panna Lal Sharma, wherein he was summoned for offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C. A sale deed was got executed by Rewati Prasad for plot no. 75 on 17.02.1993. This plot was obtained in a public auction from Sales Tax Department by Rewati Prasad and subsequently this public auction was cancelled by department concerned, of which information was communicated to Rewati Prasad on 28.07.1992. Even after being informed about ownership of plot no. 75, Rewati Prasad executed sale deed for same plot in favour of complainant for a consideration of Rs.8,500/-, which was not under his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top