2019 Supreme(All) 1715
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
VIPIN SINHA, AJIT SINGH, JJ.
Rakhi Sharma - Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. - 3953 of 2018
Decided On : 23-01-2019
For the Appellant : Upendra Nath Mishra
For the Respondent: G.A., Mahipal Singh
Headnote:
Indian Penal Code – Section 363, 366 – Offence of Kidnapping – Punishment for Kidnapping – Held, girl who attained age more than 17 years and already carrying pregnancy cannot stated to have not attained age of discretion, a technicality in law would not attracted, Court has not shown any material which indicate coercion, inducement or forceful act on part of petitioner No.2 so as to conclude offence has committed by him, girl is an adult as per the medical certificate and in view of the statement of the girl under Section 164 case for grant of indulgence has made out – Writ petition allowed. (Para 28,30,31)
Facts of the case:
Offence of Kidnapping – Punishment for Kidnapping.
Findings of the court:
Girl who attained age more than 17 years and already carrying pregnancy cannot stated to have not attained age of discretion, a technicality in law would not attracted, Court has not shown any material which indicate coercion, inducement or forceful act on part of petitioner No.2 so as to conclude offence has committed by him, girl is an adult as per the medical certificate and in view of the statement of the girl under Section 164 case for grant of indulgence has made out.
Result : Writ petition allowed.
ORDER :
1. Heard Shri Upendra Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Shri Mahipal Singh, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.3 and also filed a counter affidavit.
2. The present is a habeas corpus writ petition filed on behalf of corpus Rakhi Sharma through her husband Ajay Sharma with the following prayer:
“A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus commanding the respondent no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Government Women Protection Home, District Allahabad to release the corpus petitioner Rakhi Sharma, who has been detained illegally in the Government Women Protection Home, District Allahabad and set her at liberty.
B. Issue any such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.
C. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioners.”
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is to the effect that Rakhi Sharma, the corpus has solemnized marriage with Ajay Sharma of her own sweet will without any fear, threat or coercion and as per the Hindu religion on 20.7.2018. A copy of the marriage certificate in this regard, issued by Arya Samaj Mandir, Lucknow has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
4. It appears that subsequently the father of the victim lodged an FIR with the allegation that his minor daughter Rakhi Sharma aged about 16 years was kidnapped by Ajay Sharma. The FIR was registered as case crime no.136 of 2018 under Section 363, 366 IPC. The copy of the FIR has also been annexed as Annnexure-2 to the writ petition. From the record it appears that being aggrieved against the lodging of the FIR, a writ petition being Misc. Bench No.24227 of 2018 Ajay Sharma and another vs State of UP through Principal Secretary, Home and others, in which an order was passed on 27.8.2018 with the direction that petitioners be not taken in custody till the next date of listing and the petitioners were directed to join the investigation which shall be conducted under the supervision of Circle Officer concerned. The Circle Officer was directed to file affidavit as to under what circumstances it is being concluded that the petitioner has committed any offence. The copy of the order dated 27.8.2018 has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. A perusal of the said order shows that while passing the said order the Division Bench of this Court at Lucknow Bench had relied upon the judgment dated 23.7.2015 passed in Writ Petition No.3519 (M/B) of 2015.
5. The attention of the Court has also been drawn to the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 CrPC which has been annexed as Annexure-4 at page 25 of the writ petition. In the said statement the girl categorically says as under:
,s/kk Fkkuk egs'kxat us l'kiFk c;ku fd;k fd & 04-07-18 dks eSa Hkkxdj fnYyh pyh x;h FkhA 07-30 cts lqcg ls fudyh Fkh Ldwy tkus ds fy,A ghjkxat ogkW esjk Ldwy gS] ogkW igqWpsA igqWpdj VsyhQksu ls vt; 'kekZ ls ckr djds mls cqyk;kA fQj mlds lkFk fnYyh xbZA fnYyh esa 06-07-18 dks larks"kh ekrk ds eafnj] mRreuxj esa eSus vt; ds lkFk 'kknh dj yhA ge muds cqvk ds ;gkW jgrs FksA vt; us esjs lkFk dksbZ xyr dk;Z ugh fd;k vkSj u gh dksbZ tksj tcjnLrh dhA vt; us esjs lkFk dksbZ 'kkjhfjd lEcU/k ugha cuk;kA eSa viuh ethZ ds lkFk vt; ds lkFk x;h FkhA esjs ikik Ldwy esa esjh mez de fy[kok;s gSA okLro esa bl le; esjh mez 19 o"kZ ds yxHkx gSA eSa vius dks 18 o"kZ ls Åij dh le>rh gwW] blfy, ftrsUnz dqekj 'kekZ o /kesZUnz dqekj dk esjs fnYyh tkus esa dksbZ jksy ugha gSA ,Q0vkbZ0vkj0 esa budk xyr uke fy[kk fn;k gSA eSa fnYyh viuh ethZ ls x;h FkhA eSa vt; ds lkFk gh jguk pkgrh gwWA esjs ?kj okys eq>s tku ls ekjuk pkgrs gSA
6. From the aforesaid statement, it is clear that it was the girl herself who has taken initiative and called Ajay Sharma on telephone and thereafter solemnized marriage with him. The said statement also shows that the girl is an adult aged about 19 years. She has also mentioned