SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1785

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Amrendra Nath Rai, Sanjay Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. The applicants Ram Singh, Guddu and Ram Vinay, by means of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash summoning order dated 01.5.2019 passed by A.C.J.M. Court No. 11, Azamgarh, in Complaint Case No. 4433 of 2019, Sripatti Devi Vs. Ram Vinay and others, whereby summoning Ram Singh and Guddu for offence punishable u/s 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Ram Vinay for offence punishable u/s 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. as well as entire proceedings of aforesaid complaint Case.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the records.

3. Learned counsel for applicants argued that applicants are innocent. They have been summoned in Criminal Complaint Case No. 4433 of 2019 vide order dated 01.5.2019 passed by A.C.J.M. Court No. 11, Azamgarh, whereby summoning Ram Singh and Guddu for offence punishable u/s 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C. whereas Ram Vinay for offence punishable u/s 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., whereas a complaint was filed by Ram Vinay against complainant and others wherein summoning for offences punishable u/s 323, 504, 506, 354B I.P.C. against Pramod Verma, Vijay Verma an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top