PANKAJ MITHAL, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Akram Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Revindra Singh, learned counsel for the fourth respondent.
2. The petitioners herein asserting themselves to be sugarcane growers who are residents of Village Nawabganj, Tehsil Sahaswan, District Budaun have filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to attach the Zarifnagar Cane Purchase Centre to D.S.M. Sugar Mills, Rajpura, District Sambhal for the convenience of the sugarcane growers in their village. A further prayer has been made for a direction to decide their representation which is stated to have been submitted before the respondents.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the fourth respondent have raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition at the behest of the individual cane grower is not maintainable and that any grievance in this regard can be espoused through the cane growers' cooperative society of the area in question. It is submitted that the writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming themselves to b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.