SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2046

RAMESH SINHA, AJIT KUMAR
Husna Bano – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Muktesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondents: C.S.C. and Baleshwar Chaturvedi Adv.

ORDER :

1. Heard Sri Muktesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and perused the record.

2. The petitioner by means of the present petition, has prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 28.06.2019 passed by respondent no. 5 whereby certain more information has been sought from the petitioner regarding her possession over the property in question as electricity connection is being sought by the petitioner.

3. The controversy has arisen on account of landlord tenant dispute between the petitioner and respondent nos. 5 to 10 on account of death of the main land-lady Rubiya Begam, w/o Azeemullah. The facts as have pleaded in the present writ petition are that on account of dispute of succession amongst the heirs who are respondent nos. 6 to 10 here in this petition, the petitioner has been under serious threat of eviction in an unauthorized way from the premises in question. Since she was a tenant for Rs. 200/- per month for the accommodation let out to her by late Rubiya Begam and the petitioner has Rashan Card and permanent Adhar Card issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top