SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Shashi Kant Gupta, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, JJ.
The Indian Section the Theosophical Society – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Ors. – Respondents
Writ C. No. 17658 of 2019
Decided On : 03-09-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ishir Sripat and Rahul Sripat

Headnote:

Indian Societies Registration Act, 1860 petitioner - society is a registered society under the Act, 1860 – Society applied for the renewal firstly in the year 1973 i.e. after expiry of 30 years and secondly in the year 2003 i.e. after expiry of further 30 years. However, no decision was taken and both the application for renewal were kept pending – Rejection under – Held, It is well settled that natural justice cannot be placed in a straight-jacket; its rules are not embodied and they do vary from case to case and from one fact-situation to another. All that has to be seen is that no adverse civil consequences are allowed to ensue before one is put on notice that the consequence would follow if he would not take care of the lapse, because of which the action as made known is contemplated – there is violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition to the extent that the impugned order dated 23.1.2019 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months from today. Meanwhile, the respondents will take a fresh decision regarding the cancellation of lease after issuing notice to the petitioner and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - society within the stipulated period mentioned hereinabove.

Facts of the Case:

Collector, impugned order after considering the inspection report communicated by the A.D.M., Gorakhpur came to the conclusion that petitioner -society has violated many conditions mentioned in lease agreement, therefore, the Collector, Gorakhpur not only rejected the application for freehold but also cancelled the lease and directed to remove the illegal occupants and to take over the possession of the lease land. In pursuance of the said order, possession of the lease land was taken over by the State after making inventory of the material lying on the lease land and presently, the possession of the land is with the State Government.

Finding of the Court:

It is well settled that natural justice cannot be placed in a straight-jacket; its rules are not embodied and they do vary from case to case and from one fact-situation to another. All that has to be seen is that no adverse civil consequences are allowed to ensue before one is put on notice that the consequence would follow if he would not take care of the lapse, because of which the action as made known is contemplated – there is violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition to the extent that the impugned order dated 23.1.2019 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months from today. Meanwhile, the respondents will take a fresh decision regarding the cancellation of lease after issuing notice to the petitioner and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - society within the stipulated period mentioned hereinabove.

Result: Writ petition disposed

ORDER :

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

1. The writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-

    "(i) a writ of certiorari to send for the records of the case and to quash the orders dated 23.01.2019 passed by the respondent no. 2 and the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 13 and 14 respectively to the writ petition).

(ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to grant free hold rights to the petitioner on his application dated 31.07.2009.

(iii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to restore the possession of Nazul Plot in Arazi Chavani, Tappa and Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur area 1.35 acres as contained in the leased deed which has been filed as annexure 1 with the writ petition."

2. Brief facts giving rise to this writ petition are that:-

    The petitioner - society is a registered society under the Indian Societies Registration Act, 1860 which is renewed up to 10.10.2020 as per the certificate dated 11.3.2016, issued by the Registrar of Societies Registration, U.P..

3. The petitioner - society was granted a lease of nazul plot in Arazi Chavni, Tappa and Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, area 1.35 acres with boundaries described in the lease agreement dated 31.12.1943 under the Government Grants Act, 1895. The term of said lease was for thirty years on the payment of the certain yearly rent with the condition of renewal by every 30 years with the restriction of the term not exceeding the aggregate for the period of 90 years.

4. As per the case of the petitioner, society applied for the renewal firstly in the year 1973 i.e. after expiry of 30 years and secondly in the year 2003 i.e. after expiry of further 30 years. However, no decision was taken and both the application for renewal were kept pending.

5. In the year 2003, the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur issued a notice dated 14.1.2003 to the Secretary of the petitioner - society mentioning therein that as per the policy of the Government, the petitioner - society could apply for freehold. In pursuance of the said notice, petitioner - society deposited the requisite amount of Rs. 40,00,000/- in two installments dated 31.8.2009 and dated 23.1.2010 and also submitted an application in the prescribed proforma in the year 2010. Meanwhile, a report was sought by the Collector, Gorakhpur regarding the status of the lease area. Accordingly, the Tehsildar after inspection submit a report dated 23.1.2008 wherein violation of certain conditions of lease agreement were found.

6. The Collector, Gorakhpur communicated the same to the State under letter dated 26.2.2008 wherein violations of certain conditions of lease were communicated. For ready reference, said letter is reproduced hereinafter:-

    ^^Ás"kd
    ftykf/kdkjh]
    xksj[kiqjA
    lsok esa]
    Jh fo".kq Árki flag]
    la;qDr lfpo]
    m0Á0 'kklu]
    vkokl ,oa 'kgjh fu;kstu vuqHkkx&4]
    y[kuÅA
    la[;k & 77@,y0ch0lh0&08]
    fnukad& 26 Qjojh] 2008
    fo"k;%& fFk;kslkfQdy lkslkbVh ds iV~Vs ds uohuhdj.k ds laca/k esaA
    egksn;]
    d`i;k mi;qDr fo"k;d 'kkllukns'k la[;k&1688@vkB&4&05&288 ,u]@2005 fnukad 02-3-2006 dk lanHkZ xzg.k djus dk d"V djsa] ftlds }kjk 5 fcUnqvksa ij lwpuk@vk[;k 'kklu dks miyC/k djkus dk funsZ'k fn;k x;k bl laca/k esa okafNr lwpuk@vk[;k fuEuor~ gS&
    1- iV~Vs dh Nk;k Áfr layXu gSA
    2- ftyk 'kkldh; vf/koDrk nhokuh dh jk; fnukad 01-12-04 dh Nk;k Áfr layXu gSA
    3- 'kklukns'k la[;k&6422¼6½@9&utwy&485,u@83 fnukad 16-10-86 esa dqN 'krksZ ij vfrpkjh ds yht dks fofufeRrhdj.k djus dk Ákfo/kku fd;k x;k gS ftlds ÁLrj&3 esa ;g Hkh Ákfo/kku gS fd iV~Vs ds mya?ku ds ekeys esa mDr dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA fFk;kslkfQdy lkslkbVh ds dFkukuqlkj ;g laLFkk fo'o Lrjh; psjhVscqy laLFkk gS rFkk fo'o cU/kqRo] lkEÁnkf;d ln~Hkkouk] ekuo ds lokZxh.k fodkl rFkk i'kqvksa ds lkFk gks jgh dwjrk dks lekIr djus dh fn'kk esa fujarj Á;kljr gS rFkk laLFkk ds fØ;k dykiksa dks ns[krs gq, mDr laLFkk ds iV~Vs dk uohuhdj.k fd;s tkus dk iw.kZ vkSfpR; gSA
    4- Á'uxr Hkw[k.M ds laca/k esa rglhynkj ls tkap djkbZ x;h tkap fjiksVZ fnukad 23-1-08 ftlds lk



































        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top