IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Shashi Kant Gupta, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, JJ.
The Indian Section the Theosophical Society – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Ors. – Respondents
Writ C. No. 17658 of 2019
Decided On : 03-09-2019
Indian Societies Registration Act, 1860 petitioner - society is a registered society under the Act, 1860 – Society applied for the renewal firstly in the year 1973 i.e. after expiry of 30 years and secondly in the year 2003 i.e. after expiry of further 30 years. However, no decision was taken and both the application for renewal were kept pending – Rejection under – Held, It is well settled that natural justice cannot be placed in a straight-jacket; its rules are not embodied and they do vary from case to case and from one fact-situation to another. All that has to be seen is that no adverse civil consequences are allowed to ensue before one is put on notice that the consequence would follow if he would not take care of the lapse, because of which the action as made known is contemplated – there is violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition to the extent that the impugned order dated 23.1.2019 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months from today. Meanwhile, the respondents will take a fresh decision regarding the cancellation of lease after issuing notice to the petitioner and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - society within the stipulated period mentioned hereinabove.
Facts of the Case:
Collector, impugned order after considering the inspection report communicated by the A.D.M., Gorakhpur came to the conclusion that petitioner -society has violated many conditions mentioned in lease agreement, therefore, the Collector, Gorakhpur not only rejected the application for freehold but also cancelled the lease and directed to remove the illegal occupants and to take over the possession of the lease land. In pursuance of the said order, possession of the lease land was taken over by the State after making inventory of the material lying on the lease land and presently, the possession of the land is with the State Government.
Finding of the Court:
It is well settled that natural justice cannot be placed in a straight-jacket; its rules are not embodied and they do vary from case to case and from one fact-situation to another. All that has to be seen is that no adverse civil consequences are allowed to ensue before one is put on notice that the consequence would follow if he would not take care of the lapse, because of which the action as made known is contemplated – there is violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition to the extent that the impugned order dated 23.1.2019 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of four months from today. Meanwhile, the respondents will take a fresh decision regarding the cancellation of lease after issuing notice to the petitioner and after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - society within the stipulated period mentioned hereinabove.
Result: Writ petition disposed
ORDER :
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.
1. The writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
(ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to grant free hold rights to the petitioner on his application dated 31.07.2009.
(iii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to restore the possession of Nazul Plot in Arazi Chavani, Tappa and Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur area 1.35 acres as contained in the leased deed which has been filed as annexure 1 with the writ petition."
2. Brief facts giving rise to this writ petition are that:-
3. The petitioner - society was granted a lease of nazul plot in Arazi Chavni, Tappa and Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, Gorakhpur, area 1.35 acres with boundaries described in the lease agreement dated 31.12.1943 under the Government Grants Act, 1895. The term of said lease was for thirty years on the payment of the certain yearly rent with the condition of renewal by every 30 years with the restriction of the term not exceeding the aggregate for the period of 90 years.
4. As per the case of the petitioner, society applied for the renewal firstly in the year 1973 i.e. after expiry of 30 years and secondly in the year 2003 i.e. after expiry of further 30 years. However, no decision was taken and both the application for renewal were kept pending.
5. In the year 2003, the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur issued a notice dated 14.1.2003 to the Secretary of the petitioner - society mentioning therein that as per the policy of the Government, the petitioner - society could apply for freehold. In pursuance of the said notice, petitioner - society deposited the requisite amount of Rs. 40,00,000/- in two installments dated 31.8.2009 and dated 23.1.2010 and also submitted an application in the prescribed proforma in the year 2010. Meanwhile, a report was sought by the Collector, Gorakhpur regarding the status of the lease area. Accordingly, the Tehsildar after inspection submit a report dated 23.1.2008 wherein violation of certain conditions of lease agreement were found.
6. The Collector, Gorakhpur communicated the same to the State under letter dated 26.2.2008 wherein violations of certain conditions of lease were communicated. For ready reference, said letter is reproduced hereinafter:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.