ANIL KUMAR, SAURABH LAVANIA
Neetu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Saurabh Lavania, J.
1. Heard Sri Shailendra Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned C.S.C. for the opposite party No. 1 and Sri Abhinav N. Trivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3.
By means of the instant Writ Petition the Petitioner who is working as Professor in the Department of Centre for Advanced Research (Molecular Biology) of King George's Medical University (hereinafter referred to as 'KGMU') has sought a Writ of Quo-warranto against Respondent No. 4 Dr. Shailendra Saxena working as Professor in the Department of Centre for Advanced Research (Stem Cell/Cell Culture Lab) requiring him to show-cause as to under which Authority of Law he is holding the post of Professor.
In the present writ petition, following main relief has been sought:
2. The Writ Petition has been filed on the ground that the Respondent No. 4 lacks the educational qualification as required by an incumbent for bein
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.