SUNEET KUMAR
Suresh Chandra Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Suneet Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner came to be appointed temporary Seasonal Collection Amin, on 7 February 1978, in pay-scale 200-320 and thereafter, was granted regular pay-scale of Collection Amin from 1982, until his retirement on attaining the age of superannuation on 31 July 2010. Petitioner was granted increments, bonus, leave encashment and income tax was regularly deducted from his salary. The pay-scale was revised from time to time. During service, petitioner filed several petitions seeking regularization under 35% quota provided under the Uttar Pradesh Collection Amins Service Rules, 1974 (for short "the Rules 1974"). The petition being Writ-A No. 20531 of 2010 came to be disposed of on 24 November 2014, directing the Collector, Ballia, to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization on the post of Collection Amin under the Rules, 1974. The District Magistrate, Ballia, vide order dated 4 April 2015, rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that he was not found suitable. The petitioner immediately after retirement filed a petition being W
Shakuntala @ Brahmo Devi (Smt.) v. Director of Pension
Mrs. Raj Kanta v. Financial Commissioner, Punjab and another
Yashwant Hari Katakkar v. Union of India and others
A.P. Srivastava v. Union of India and others
Awadh Bihari Shukla v. State of UP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.