RAJIV JOSHI
Lalloo – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent
ORDER :
Rajiv Joshi, J.
1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the plaintiffs-petitioners challenging the validity of the order dated 16.4.2004 passed by the Board of Revenue U.P. At Allahabad in Second Appeal No. 06 of 2002-2003 (Dashrath & Ors. Vs. Panna Lal & Ors) whereby the second appeal filed by respondent nos. 7 to 11 was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 7.6.2003 passed by the Commissioner, Vindhyachal Division Mirzapur as well as order dated 22.10.2002 passed by the Assistant Collector /Upziladhikari, Gyanpur, Badohi were set aside.
2. The relevant facts for consideration in the present case are; that plot no. 47 having area of 2 bighas situate in Village Bhatpura, Tehsil Aurai, District- Sant Ravidan Nagar is the disputed land and said land is also part of Khata No. 40.
3. The mother of the plaintiffs-petitioners namely Smt. Kalawati Devi and defendant -respondent no. 12 Panna Lal s/o Lalloo Yadav executed a registered sale-deed dated 10.7.1970 in favour of Ram Pyare Singh (father of respondent nos. 2 to 5) and Lal Pratap Singh, (father of defendant respondent no. 6). On the strength of said sale- deed, the names of Ram Py
Kamla Prasad & Ors. Vs. Krishna Kant Pathak & Ors.
Ram Awalamb Anr. Vs. Jata Shanker & Ors.
Ram Padarath and Ors. Vs. Second ADJ & Ors.
Shri Ram & Anr. Vs. 1st Additional Judge
Tej Bhan Singh Anr. Vs. IX ADJ Jaunpur & Ors.
Vishwambhar & Anr. Vs. Laxmi Narayana (Dead) through Lrs. & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.