SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Udit Kumar Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Learned counsel for the informant has filed short counter affidavit dated 24.11.2019. In reply, short rejoinder affidavit dated 25.11.2019 has been filed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shishir Tandon, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate on behalf of the State of U.P. and Sri Imran Ullah, Advocate assisted by Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the informant/Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited.
3. By means of this application, the applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No.622 of 2018, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Link Road, District Ghaziabad, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
4. Filtering out unnecessary details, basic facts as per prosecution case, which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of this bail application are that the dispute in this case is regarding property situated at C-51, Ramprastha Colony, Ghaziabad measuring about 355 square yards (herein-after referred to as the “property in question”). In the year 1982, said property was purchased by Dr. R.K. Malhotra from one Balw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.