MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. At the time of filing of the present petition, certified copy of the impugned order has not been annexed along with the present petition.
2. Today, a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner enclosing certified copy of the order impugned. The same is taken on record.
3. Heard Mr. S. Sengar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State as also perused the material on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A for the State agree that the present petition may be disposed of at this stage without calling for counter affidavit in view of the order proposed to be passed today.
5. Normally this Court would have issued notice to opposite party no.2 to contest the matter by filing counter affidavit either by herself or through counsel, but no purpose would be served by keeping the application pending. However, it shall be open for opposite party no.2 to file an appropriate application, if she feels so aggrieved.
6. The present criminal revision has been filed to quash the judgment and order dated 20th September, 2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya in consequential proceedings of Case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.