SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2208

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Ram Bharose Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Ashish Kumar, Neeraj Kumar

JUDGMENT :

1. This Application, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed by the Applicants, Ram Bharose Lal, Jai Singh and Kallu, against State of U.P. and Smt. Meena, with a prayer for quashing of entire criminal proceeding as well as setting aside summoning order, dated 30.7.2019, passed by III Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Area), Budaun, in SST No.1478 of 2019 (Complaint Case No.49 of 2018), Meena vs. Ram Bharose Lal and others, under Sections 392 and 354 of IPC, Police Station-Bisauli, District-Budaun.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants argued that it was a false and malicious accusation, filed by way of an application, under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. and was treated as a complaint case, as a counterblast of case crime no.675 of 2017, for offences, punishable, under Sections 392 and 354 of IPC of Police Station-Bisauli, District Budaun, for which a report was lodged by Ram Bharose Lal against Hira Lal, when Hira Lal outraged modesty of victim, daughter of informant on 7.10.2017, wherein a chargesheet has been filed and as a counter-blast case, wife of Hira Lal, has filed this case against applicants, wherein, applicant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top