SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
Nawab Kazim Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Naveen Sinha, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Kalpana Sinha and Shri Raghav Nayar, learned counsel for the election petitioner and Sri N.K. Pandey along with Sri S.A. Kazmi, learned counsel for the respondent - returned candidate.
Facts
2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that notification under the Representation of the People's Act 1951 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act 1951”) was issued notifying for election of U.P. State Legislative Assembly from 34-Suar, District – Rampur constituency. A public notice was also issued by the Returning Officer fixing the following programme for holding the election from the aforesaid constituency :-
(b) date of scrutiny of nomination papers 28.01.2017
(c) Date of Withdrawal of nomination papers 30.01.2017
(d) Date of allotment of symbols 01.02.2017
(e) Date of poll 15.02.2017
(f) Date of counting 11.03.2017
3. After scrutiny and withdrawal of nomination papers, the election petitioner and six other persons including the respondent were the candidates who remain
A. Shanmugam vs. Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam and others
Brij Mohan Singh Vs. Priya Brat Narain Sinha
Cox and Kings (Agents) Ltd. vs. Their Workmen and Others
Durga Shanker Mehta Vs. Thakur Raghuraj Singh
Sushil Kumar Vs. Rakesh Kumar 2003 8 SCC 673
Mukarrab and others Vs. State of U.P. (2017) 2 SCC 210
Orissa Mining Corporation and another vs. Ananda Chandra Prusty
Union of India and Others vs. Sugauli Sugar Works (P) Ltd.
Zeba Haseeb @ Ankita Vs. State of U.P. And others 2015 (2) ADJ 215
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.