RAMESH SINHA, AJIT KUMAR
Silpa Devi Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Sri Rakesh Prasad has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner which is taken on record. He states that he has taken no objection from Ms. Mamta Sen earlier counsel for the petitioner.
2. Heard Sri Rakesh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Swati Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6, Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 20.7.2018 passed by respondent no. 2 transferring the investigation to the C.B.C.I.D. in case crime no. 217 of 2016 under sections 323, 376, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, police station Utraon, District Allahabad and case crime no. 255 of 2016 under sections 323, 504, 506, 452 I.P.C., police station Utraon, District Allahabad.
4. Brief facts of the case are that a First Information Report has been lodged by the petitioner against accused-respondent no. 6 Lal Chand Patel which was registered as case crime no. 217 of 2016 under sections 323, 376, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act at police station Utraon, District Allahabad and fter investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet against accused
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.