SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2392

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Arvind Parmar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ram Datt Dauholia and Nanhe Lal Tripathi

ORDER :

RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, J.

1. This Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), has been filed by the convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja, Rajan @ Rajendra, and Raheem Khan, against the judgment of conviction, dated 20.07.2018 and sentences awarded therein, by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (U.P. Dacoity Affected Area), Lalitpur, in Sessions Trial No. 26 of 2013 (State vs. Arvind Parmar @ Bunty and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 1613 of 2012, under Sections 457, 380, 411, 413 and 511 of Indian Penal Code (Hereinafter in short referred to as 'IPC'), Police Station-Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur, whereby convict-appellants, Arvind Parmar @ Bunty, Rajan @ Rajendra and Rahim Khan have been sentenced with five years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 5,000/-, each, under Section 380 IPC, and Ten years' rigorous imprisonment, with fine of Rs. 10,000/-, each, under Section 457 IPC. In case of default of deposit of fine of Rs. 10,000, they will have to serve one year's simple imprisonment and in default of deposit of fine of Rs. 5,000/-, they will have to serve six mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top