MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Vijay Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ronak Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Anand Priya Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr. Prashant Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State assisted by Mr. P.K. Sahi, State Law Officer.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned A.G.A. agree that the present application may be disposed of at this stage without calling for further affidavits in view of the order proposed to be passed today.
3. By means of this 482 Cr.P.C. application, the applicant has questioned order dated 16th September, 2014 summoning the applicant, order dated 21st March, 2015 issuing non-bailable warrant against him as well as the entire proceedings of the Complaint Case
No. 1546 of 2014 (Om Construction Vs. M/s. Komal Construction), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the “N.I. Act”), Police Station-Obra, District-Sonbhadra, pending in the Court of .
4. The facts, as borne out from the complaint made by opposite party no.2 against the applicant on 13th August, 2014 under Section 138 N.I. Act in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonebhadra, are as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.