ANANT KUMAR
Manish Kanaujia Thru. Father Ram Bakash – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal revision under Section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has been filed against the judgment and order dated 20.09.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Ambedkar Nagar in Criminal Appeal No.37 of 2019, by which the order dated 30.07.2019, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ambedkar Nagar in Bail Application No.22 of 2019 relating to Case Crime No. 65 of 2019, under Section 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar hsa been confirmed.
2. In this case an F.I.R. was lodged on 20.04.2019 to the effect that on 15.04.2019 prosecutrix had gone to attend her school but when she did not return from the School, a search was made and it was found that she had not gone to her school. Thereafter, from the reliable sources it was informed that named accused persons had managed her to elope with the revisionist. In this case initially F.I.R. was lodged under Section 363, 366 IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act. It is submitted that when the prosecutrix was recovered after 3-4 days her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.