MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Sarita Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Vidya Bhusan Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant petition is directed against the order dated 7 May 2019 passed by Revisional Court in Civil Revision No.177 of 2018 whereby the revisional court has allowed the revision and has set aside the order dated 12 November 2018 passed by the trial court. The trial court, by the said order, had allowed the application Paper No.94-C and condoned delay in filing of the written statement by the petitioner (defendant No.2).
2. In short, the facts giving rise to the instant petition are as follows: –
3. The plaintiff-respondent instituted Original Suit No. 261 of 2016 against the petitioner and respondent No.2 for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 18/19 February 1988 and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-petitioner from executing any sale deed in respect of the suit property. The petitioner entered appearance in the suit on 29 April 2016. She filed an application on 6 May 2016 under Order 7 Rule, 11 CPC praying for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit is barred by the law of limitation.
4. The petitioner did not file any written statement. She kept on pursuing her application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC. Ultimately, it was n
Atcom Technologies Limited Vs. Y.A. Chunawala and Company and others
Bonton Plastics Pvt. Ltd. Delhi Vs. Ramesh Chawla and another
Kailash Vs. Nanhku and others, AIR 2005 SC 2441 and Zolba Vs. Keshao and others
R K Roja versus US Rayudu and another
SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.