SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 2464

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA
Dhirendra Pal Solanki – Appellant
Versus
44, Noida Infratech (Two) Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Manish Goyal, Nikhil Mishra
For the Respondents: Kartikeya Saran

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Manish Goyal for the revisionist in these four revisions and Shri Anurag Khanna, assisted by Shri Kartikeya Saran for the opposite party in each of these revisions.

2. In all these four revisions, objections under Section 47 C.P.C. have been rejected by the Executing Court.

3. The contesting opposite party filed Execution Case No. 504/2015 for execution of a conciliation agreement entered between the parties on 12.09.2014 and Execution Case No. 66/2016 for execution of a conciliation agreement dated 12.09.2014. Another Execution Case No. 117/2016 was filed by the opposite party for execution of a judgment dated 27.08.2014 passed by the Delhi High Court on the basis of memorandum of understanding dated 13.08.2014 Original Suit No. 194/2014. In these execution cases, objections under Section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code were filed by the Directors of M/s Sanwariya Gas and by M/s Sanwariya Gas itself.

4. As noticed above, all these objections under Section 47 C.P.C. have been rejected by the executing court. All the orders are dated 23.03.2019. One order has been passed rejecting the objection under Section 47 filed in Execution Case No. 66/2017 while the other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top