SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 385

PANKAJ MITHAL, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Rakesh Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B.C. Rai
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Bhanu Bhushan Jauhari, Nisheeth Yadav, Ramendra Pratap Singh

JUDGMENT :

1. In pursuance to the advertisement dated 03.02.2004 issued by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), the petitioner vide order dated 04.06.2004 was allotted plot No.1 Cassia Fistula Estate, Sector CHI-IV of 1000 sq. mtrs.

2. On actual measurement there was some extra land of 22.4 sq. mtrs. in the aforesaid plot for which additional premium was demanded and charged.

3. After the petitioner completed all formalities and fulfilled the conditions of allotment by depositing the premium amount, lease rent etc., a registered lease deed in respect to the whole of the said plot having an area of 1022.4 sq. mtrs. was executed in his favour on 17.12.2008. Consequently, its possession was also delivered on 18.12.08 to him.

4. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking a direction that the location of the said plot from that of a corner plot adjoining to the green belt may not be changed and to declare any change or proposed change in this regard to be illegal and arbitrary. In other words, the plot should remain in its original form as a corner pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top