JASPREET SINGH
Sagynbek Toktobolotov – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. The Court has heard Sri. Pranshu Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. J.S. Tomar, learned AGA via video conference.
On application for Amendment in the memo of Bail Application:
2. At the outset, it will be relevant to mention that the learned counsel for the applicants had moved an application for amendment in the bail application and had sought to add two more Sections, in the bail application, with which the applicants have been challenged and remanded.
3. The copy of the amendment application was served on the learned A.G.A. on 30.05.2020 who has received his instructions and all necessary documents in respect of the above bail application.
4. The learned A.G.A. has filed his written instructions, as well as the copy of the case diary, which is taken on record.
5. Considering the amendment application, it is not disputed by the learned A.G.A. that two Sections namely Section 3(3) of Passports (Entry into India) Act, 1920 and Section 51 of Diasaster Management Act, 2005, which as per the learned counsel for the applicants were inadvertently left out, are also pressed against the applicants, hence the application for amendment shall stands
Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
Gurcharan Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (1978) 1 SCC 118 : 1978 SCC (Cri) 41
Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal vs. State of T.N. (2005) 2 SCC 13 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 481
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2001) 4 SCC 280 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 674
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.