CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Lakshman Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law/Legal Remembrancer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Since similar question of facts and law are involved in the bunch of writ petitions, therefore, they are being decided by this common order.
2. By means of bunch of writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the order passed by learned Advocate General vide which appointment of the petitioners have been cancelled and their services have been terminated with immediate effect.
3. In Writ Petition Nos.883 (SS) of 2019, 3047 (SS) of 2018, 3402 (SS) of 2018, 3880 (SS) of 2018 & 4634 (SS) of 2018, the petitioners have challenged order dated 22.12.2017 by means of which appointment order of the petitioners has been cancelled and their services have been terminated with immediate effect.
4. The background facts in which Writ Petition No.9184 (SS) of 2018 has been filed are briefly stated as under :-
Anand Kumar Yadav v. Union of India
Arun Tewari v. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh
Binod Kumar Gupta v. Ram Ashray Mahoto
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees' Union v. Delhi Admn.
Dr. M.S. Mudhol and Anr. v. S.D. Halegkar and Ors.
Excise Supdt. v. K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao
National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Somvir Singh
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi and Others
State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh & Ors.
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh
State of M.P. v. Mohd. Abrahim
State of Orissa and Ors. vs. Mamata Mohanty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.