SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(All) 616

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Shashi Kant Gupta, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, JJ.
Uma Mittal And 4 Others - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India And 5 Others - Respondents
Writ C No. 40096 of 2019
Decided On : 15-06-2020

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Bidhan Chandra Rai.
For the Respondent: A.S.G.I., Amrish Sahai, C.S.C., Maneesh Mehrotra, Satish Chaturvedi, Seema Singh, Manish Mehrotra.

Headnote:

National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation, and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 – Section 2 – Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 – Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 – Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 – Maintenance – Guardianship – Medical treatment – Present writ petition has been preferred seeking relief to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus appointing petitioner No.1, as guardian of her husband to protect his interest, administer bank accounts, investments, proprietorship business, etc. and in the event of necessity, to sell immovable property standing in name of her husband and to use proceeds towards medical treatment of her husband and family welfare expenses – Held, It is reiterated that upon fulfilment of requisite formalities, concerned Banks (Respondents No. 5 and 6)/any other financial institutes will permit the Petitioner No. 1, to operate bank accounts and deal with other financial affairs standing in name of SKM – It is made clear that the Petitioner No. 1, shall not sell, alienate encumber any of immovable properties of SKM except with express permission of Registrar General of this Court – Petitioner No. 1 would file a report with Registrar General of this Court every six months, detailing transactions in respect of assets of SKM – Petition Disposed of (Paras 34, 35, 36, 38)

Facts of the case:

Petitioner No.1, is the wife of Sri Sunil Kumar Mittal (in short 'SKM'), son of Late Visheshwar Dayal Mittal. The couple had four children (Petitioners Nos. 2 to 5) i.e. three daughters namely Mrs. Mohini Mittal Raizada, Ms. Ritika Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and a son Mr. Raghav Mittal; Petitioner No. 2 is a married daughter, married to Sri Mukul Raizada and is presently residing with her husband at Gurgaon, Haryana. However, Petitioners No. 3 and 4 are unmarried daughters and Petitioner No. 5 is the son. The Petitioners No. 3, 4 and 5 are residing with Petitioner No. 1 at their parental house 43-A/9B, Clive Road, Civil Lines.

Findings of the court:

It is reiterated that upon fulfilment of requisite formalities, concerned Banks (Respondents No. 5 and 6)/any other financial institutes will permit the Petitioner No. 1, to operate bank accounts and deal with other financial affairs standing in name of SKM – It is made clear that the Petitioner No. 1, shall not sell, alienate encumber any of immovable properties of SKM except with express permission of Registrar General of this Court – Petitioner No. 1 would file a report with Registrar General of this Court every six months, detailing transactions in respect of assets of SKM.

Result: Petition Disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Shashi Kant Gupta, J.

1. The present writ petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:

    (a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus appointing petitioner No.1, namely Uma Mittal, W/o Sri Sunil Kumar Mittal, as the guardian of her husband to protect his interest, administer bank accounts, investments, proprietorship business, etc. and in the event of necessity, to sell the immovable property standing in the name of her husband and to use the proceeds towards medical treatment of her husband and family welfare expenses;

Backdrop

2. The material facts of the case as pleaded in the writ petition are as follows:

3. Petitioner No.1, is the wife of Sri Sunil Kumar Mittal (in short 'SKM'), son of Late Visheshwar Dayal Mittal. The couple had four children (Petitioners Nos. 2 to 5) i.e. three daughters namely Mrs. Mohini Mittal Raizada, Ms. Ritika Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and a son Mr. Raghav Mittal; Petitioner No. 2 is a married daughter, married to Sri Mukul Raizada and is presently residing with her husband at Gurgaon, Haryana. However, Petitioners No. 3 and 4 are unmarried daughters and Petitioner No. 5 is the son. The Petitioners No. 3, 4 and 5 are residing with Petitioner No. 1 at their parental house 43-A/9B, Clive Road, Civil Lines, Prayagraj;

4. It has been pleaded that on 22-12-2018 at about 1:30 a.m., it was discovered that SKM had fallen in the bathroom of his residence where he was lying unconscious, suffering from a severe head injury, nasal bleeding and vomiting. He was immediately taken to Haridaya Super-speciality Centre and thereafter to Kriti Scanning Centre where C.T. scan of his brain was carried out. On the same day about 3:30 AM, he was discharged from Haridaya Nursing Home. The discharge card mentioned that he was suffering from intracranial bleeding. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 6 (E1V1M4) and pupil right NSRL and left dilated non-reacting; Subsequently, he was taken to Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow where he was operated upon on 22-12-2018. Tracheostomy tube was inserted on 24-12-2018 and he was shifted to incentive care unit for almost fifteen days. The certificate dated 01-01-2019 shows that treatment of brain haemorrhage is going on and patient is in a comatose state; since treatment did not show any sign of meaningful neurological recovery at R.M.L. Institute, SKM was flown to New Delhi where he was admitted in Indraprastha Apollo Hospital on 07-01-2019, where he was kept in incentive care unit; after being hospitalized almost for five months, SKM was discharged from Apollo Hospital on 01-05-2019 at GCS E4VtM4, which means that he was in a comatose state. He was taken to his sister’s residence in Noida on 01-05-2019, which is near to Apollo Hospital. The petitioner arranged two nursing staff from H.D.U. Care Unit, New Delhi to look after SKM. Petitioner No.1 stayed together with him up to 26-08-2019 for routine check-ups.

5. On 29-05-2019, SKM was again admitted for routine checkup. Thereafter he was discharged on 01-06-2019 at GCS 7 (E4VtM2). It is noteworthy that during the routine check-up, the Doctors opined that till his eventual demise, patient would remain in comatose condition. Petitioner No.1 has been further advised that continued supportive treatments have to be followed up for his entire life time; In these circumstances, SKM was brought back home at Prayagraj. A room in the house of the petitioners, has been converted into a ward (like ICU) and petitioner No.1 has arranged two nursing staff for the care and comfort of SKM. After being discharged from the Apollo Hospital, SKM has not been able to communicate and has been breathing with the help of 'Tracheotomy Tube' in his throat.

6. It has been further pleaded that petitioner No. 1 applied for a disability certificate before the Chief Medical Officer, Prayagaraj. According

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top