ABHINAVA UPADHYA, SHAMIM AHMED
Ravindra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
1. Heard Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Anupam Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the prayer no.1 of the writ petition and confined his relief in respect of prayer nos. 2 to 5 only.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that one Shri Rakesh Chandra Sharma and his wife Smt. Kunti Sharma had purchased plot nos.26 and 27 measuring area 324 Sq. meters in Khasra Nos. 86/3, 86/2, 83, 84/2, 87/2 situated in village Navada, District Bareilly by registered sale deed dated 14.02.1989 and thereafter, their names were recorded in the revenue records. Thereafter, the aforesaid couple on 14.03.2004 executed a power of attorney in favour of the petitioner in respect of the said property. It is also submitted that in the aforesaid power of attorney, the signatures of the persons were attested by a notary/ advocate whose registration number and all the details were mentioned in the seal on the stamp paper. Thereafter, petitioner on 29.07.2013 presented three sale deeds to be registered in the office o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.