SUNEET KUMAR
Mayank Babu Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ashok Mehta, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The facts giving rise to the instant writ petition, briefly stated, is that petitioner came to be appointed on compassionate ground on the post of Junior Assistant Clerk on 3 July 1990. Petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 30 March 1999, passed by the second respondent-Disciplinary Authority/Joint Development Commissioner, Allahabad. The order of dismissal was subjected to challenge in a petition being Writ-A No.15413 of 1999. The writ petition came to be allowed on the ground that the principles of natural justice was flouted with impunity. The operative portion of order dated 21 November 2017, reads thus:
Surath Chandra Chakravarty Vs. The State of West Bengal
Shri Anant R. Kulkarni Vs. Y.P. Education Society & others
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank and others
Imperial Tobacco Company Limited Vs. Its Employees
Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.ED.) and others
Govinda Menon v. Union of India, AIR 1967 SC 1274
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. S. Sree Rama Rao
Sawai Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Union of India & Ors. v. Gyan Chand Chattar
Anil Gilurker v. Bilaspur Raipur Kshetria Gramin Bank & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.