PRITINKER DIWAKER, RAJEEV MISRA
Subodh Awasthy – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajeev Misra, J.
1. By means of present criminal appeal, appellant Subodh Awasthy is challenging validity and legality of judgment and order dated 06.10.2009 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge (Court no.2), Kanpur Dehat in Sessions Trial No. 298 of 2008 (State Vs. Subodh Awasthy) under Section 302 I.P.C. P.S. Shivli, District-Kanpur Dehat, arising out of Case Crime No. 331 of 2007, under Sections 307 and 302 I.P.C., P.S. Shivli, District, Kanpur Dehat and connected Sessions Trial No. 299 of 2008 (State Vs. Subodh Awasthy) under Sections 25/27 Arms Act, arising out of Case Crime No. 02 of 2008, under Sections 25/27 Arms Act, P.S. Shivli, District, Kanpur Dehat, whereby and where-under accused appellant has been convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and consequently, sentenced to life imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs. 20,000/-. In default regarding payment of fine, accused appellant is to undergo additional imprisonment of one year. Accused appellant has also been convicted under Section 27 Arms Act. Accordingly, he has been sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs. 2,000/-. In case of default in payment of aforesaid fine, accused-appella
Chaudhri Ramjibhai Narsanghbhai Vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Mohd. Shahid Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mohan Lal Ganga Ram Gehani Vs. State of Maharashtra
Nihal Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab (AIR 1965 SC 26)
Pattipati Venkaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (AIR 1985 SC 1715)
Rama and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan
Ram Bali Vs. State of U.P. as reported in 2004 (10) SCC 598
Shyam Sunder Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.