IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
K.B. Asthana, C.S.P. Singh, JJ.
BISBAMBER SAHAI AND OTHERS — Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER — Respondent
First Appeal No. 126 of 1967
Decided on : 19-04-1974
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - 1939 - SEC. 110-A - NEGLIGENCE - LIABILITY OF STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION - DRIVER OF BUS NEGLIGENTLY DRIVING BUS - STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE OF DRIVER - COMPENSATION AWARDED TO WIDOW OF DECEASED.
Fact of the Case:
Panna Lal, a tractor driver, was killed in a collision with a bus owned by the State Transport Corporation. The Plaintiffs, including Panna Lal's widow, filed a suit for compensation against the Corporation and the bus driver, Dhara Singh. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding that the accident was caused by Panna Lal's negligence. The Plaintiffs appealed.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the accident was caused by the negligence of Dhara Singh, the bus driver. The Court found that Dhara Singh failed to apply the brakes of the bus in time and that he was driving at a high speed. The Court also found that Panna Lal was contributorily negligent, as he was driving the tractor on the wrong side of the road. However, the Court held that the State Transport Corporation was vicariously liable for the negligence of Dhara Singh.
Issues: 1. Whether the accident was caused by the negligence of Dhara Singh, the bus driver? 2. Whether Panna Lal was contributorily negligent? 3. Whether the State Transport Corporation was vicariously liable for the negligence of Dhara Singh?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the accident was caused by the negligence of Dhara Singh, the bus driver. The Court found that Dhara Singh failed to apply the brakes of the bus in time and that he was driving at a high speed. The Court also found that Panna Lal was contributorily negligent, as he was driving the tractor on the wrong side of the road. However, the Court held that the State Transport Corporation was vicariously liable for the negligence of Dhara Singh. 2. The Court relied on the following principles in reaching its decision: * The driver of a motor vehicle is bound to exercise reasonable care and skill in driving the vehicle. * If a driver fails to exercise reasonable care and skill, and as a result an accident occurs, the driver is liable for the damages caused by the accident. * An employer is vicariously liable for the negligence of its employees committed in the course of their employment.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal of Panna Lal's widow and set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court. The Court decreed the widow's suit for compensation in the amount of Rs. 32,000, with costs and interest.
JUDGMENT :
C.S.P. Singh, J.—This is an appeal by the Plaintiffs arising out of a suit for compensation of Rs. 35,000/- filed against the Defendant on 14.2.1964. Panna Lal deceased was driving a Farguson tractor on Shamli-Shahdara road in the district of Muzaffarnagar. Mr. Krishna was accompanying him at that time. The Plaintiff's case is that the tractor was being driven by Panna Lal deceased at a normal speed of 8 miles per hour and when it reached near Village Lilon, a Roadways Bus No. USL-9275 belonging to the defendant No. 1 which was being driven by Dhara Singh defendant No. 2, came from the opposite direction at a high speed, and dashed against the tractor, as a result of which Panna Lal deceased sustained grievous injuries and the tractor, which was being driven by him, was irreparably damaged. The front part of the tractor rammed into the bus and was broken. The accident was the direct result of the rash and negligent driving of bus by Dhara Singh, the Defendant No. 2. The accident could have easily been avoided had the driver of the bus exercised due care and skill, while driving the vehicle. Mr. Krishna was also injured in the collision. Defendant No. 2 did not care to provide medical aid to the injured, with the result that all chances of survival of Panna Lal were set at naught. Panna Lal was subsequently removed to the Civil Hospital, Shamli, where he died as a result of the injuries. The suit was filed by Bishamber Sahai, grand father of the deceased, Mr. Duraika Das and Mrs. Bhagwati Devi, the parents, and Mrs. Urmila Devi, his widow. The Plaintiffs further alleged that due to the death of Panna Lal the yield of their agriculture farm, which he had been looking after, has been reduced by not less than Rs. 12,000/- per year. Mrs. Urmila, the wife of the deceased, suffered both mentally and physically and she was left with none to provide her subsistence. The deceased was a very healthy young man of about 33 years of age at the time of his death and had a long expectancy of life. The death of the deceased caused a loss of not less than Rs. 40,000/- but claim was being made for Rs. 35,000/- only. The State of Uttar Pradesh was vicariously liable in as much as Dhara Singh Defendant No. 2 was in its employment at the time of accident.
2. It is not necessary for the purpose of this appeal to go into details of the various defences taken up by the Defendants, inasmuch as the findings recorded on those defences against the Respondents have not been seriously challenged in the appeal. The main defence of the Defendants was that the accident had occurred due to the negligent act of the deceased Panna Lal himself and that at the time when the accident took place he was in an intoxicated condition. It was asserted that Dhara Singh, defendant No. 2, made every attempt to avoid the accident but he could not do so as Panna Lal diverted the tractor towards east when he was only 4 or 5 yards away from the bus and the collision occurred inspite of best efforts on the part of Defendant No. 2, Dhara Singh, to stop the vehicle.
3. The trial court found that the theory of intoxication setup by the Defendants had not been made out and further that intoxication was not the immediate cause of the accident. In arriving at this conclusion it referred to a number of circumstances and the evidence of Dr. V.D. Agarwal (P.W.2), who carried out the autopsy on the dead body of Panna Lal. The Dr. V.D. Agarwal has stated that no trace of alcohol were found in the internal parts of the body at the time of postmortem examination, This being so we are of the view that the trial court rightly held that the plea of the Defendants that the accident was directly caused on account of Panna Lal being intoxicated is not proved. The trial court however, came to the conclusion that the accident had taken place not due to the rash and negligent driving of Dhara Singh, Defendants No. 2, but due to the negligent and rash driving on the part of Panna Lal deceased w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.